YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Ordinances Search
Ord. 2026-08-20-2026-415City of Brenham (Washington County)

Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with Attorney - Consultation with City Attorney Regarding Dustyn Banik, Alma Sanchez and Gerran Banik v. City of Brenham, Texas; Civil Action No. 4:25-cv-2487; United States District Court, Southern Di

Bastiat Overreach Score: 54/100
Passed: 2026-08-20 • Effective: 2026-08-20

Executive Summary & Impact

Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with Attorney - Consultation with City Attorney Regarding Dustyn Banik, Alma Sanchez and Gerran Banik v. City of Brenham, Texas; Civil Action No. 4:25-cv-2487; United States District Court, Southern Di

View Official Municipal Publication

Legislative Enactment & Roll-Call History

2026-415 • City of Brenham City Council - August 20, 20262026-08-20
Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with Attorney - Consultation with City Attorney Regarding Dustyn Banik, Alma Sanchez and Gerran Banik v. City of Brenham, Texas; Civil Action No. 4:25-cv-2487; United States District Court, Southern Di
Outcome: PASSED (1-0) • Motion to approve: Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with Attorney - Consultation with City Attorney Regarding Dustyn Banik, Alma Sanchez and Gerran Banik v. City of Brenham, Texas; Civil Action No.

Official Legal Text & Codified Sections

OFFICIAL LEGISLATIVE DOCKET RECORD — CITY OF BRENHAM
Instrument / Docket Number: Ord. 2026-08-20-2026-415 (Agenda Item 2026-415)
Meeting: City of Brenham City Council - August 20, 2026
Date Enacted: 2026-08-20
Roll-Call Outcome: PASSED (6 YES - 0 NO)
Category: General Regulation
Source Document: https://brenhamtx.portal.civicclerk.com/stream/BRENHAMTX/87e815b2-5736-4865-b72e-5d02276b2dfc.pdf

VERBATIM DOCKET TEXT & SUMMARY:
Section 551.071, Texas Government Code - Consultation with Attorney - Consultation with City Attorney Regarding Dustyn Banik, Alma Sanchez and Gerran Banik v. City of Brenham, Texas; Civil Action No. 4:25-cv-2487; United States District Court, Southern Di