YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
3. • Public HearingCity of Lewisville (Denton County)

Public Hearing: Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Volume 2 of the Lewisville City Code, Known as the Unified Development Code, by Amending Article III, Chapter 6 ‘Zoning Petitions And Procedures’ and Chapter 10 ‘Zoning Text Amendments and Procedures

Presented in: City of Lewisville City Council - November 06, 2023 on 2023-11-06
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 6.9/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Public Hearing: Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Volume 2 of the Lewisville City Code, Known as the Unified Development Code, by Amending Article III, Chapter 6 ‘Zoning Petitions And Procedures’ and Chapter 10 ‘Zoning Text Amendments and Procedures”
BT
Bob Troyer
Councilmember (Place 1)
YES
WJ
William J. Meridith
Councilmember (Place 2)
YES
RC
Ronni Cade
Councilmember (Place 3)
YES
KG
Kristin Green
Councilmember (Place 5)
YES
PK
Patrick Kelly
Councilmember (Place 6)
YES
BJ
Brandon Jones
Councilmember
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Public Hearing: Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Volume 2 of the Lewisville City Code, Known as the Unified Development Code, by Amending Article III, Chapter 6 ‘Zoning Petitions And Procedures’ and Chapter 10 ‘Zoning Text Amendments and Procedures’, to Update Certain Notification Requirements Outlined Therein, by Amending Article V, Chapter 1, Section 6 ‘Nonconforming Use’ and Chapter 2 ‘Termination of Nonconforming Uses’ to Update Certain Processes Outlined Therein, and Amending Volume 1 of the Lewisville City Code, Known as the Code of Ordinances, by Amending Chapter 11, Section 11-7 ‘Sign Specifications and Design’ to Update Standards for Nonconforming Signs.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 6.9/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).