YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
8.G • CHOICE PARTNERS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS CPotter County (Potter County)

CHOICE PARTNERS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: To consider and act upon entering an interlocal agreement with Harris County Department of Education to utilize their Choice Partners Cooperative Purchasing Program. Utilizing this Program will open a new avenue of procurement of various goods and services at discounted rates. [Villalon] Interlocal-Contract-Texas_7c5.

Presented in: Potter County Commissioners Court - December 22, 2025 on 2025-12-22
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 4.8/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (5 - 0)
“CHOICE PARTNERS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: To consider and act upon entering an interlocal agreement with Harris County Department of Education to utilize their Choice Partners Cooperative Purchasing Program. Utilizing this Program will open a new avenue of procurement of various goods and services at discounted rates. [Villalon] Interlocal-Contract-Texas_7c5.”
NT
Nancy Tanner
County Judge
YES
BS
Blair Schaffer
Commissioner (Precinct 2)
YES
WC
Warren Coble, Sr.
Commissioner (Precinct 4)
YES
HK
H.R. Kelly
Commissioner (Precinct 1)
YES
JC
John Coffee
Commissioner (Precinct 3)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

CHOICE PARTNERS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: To consider and act upon entering an interlocal agreement with Harris County Department of Education to utilize their Choice Partners Cooperative Purchasing Program. Utilizing this Program will open a new avenue of procurement of various goods and services at discounted rates. [Villalon] Interlocal-Contract-Texas_7c5.pdf

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 4.8/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).