YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
M-2 • ConsentCity of Tyler (Smith County)

Request that the City Council consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a Capital Improvement Project (CIP) construction contract with Crown Civil Construction Corporation for the Tyler Water Utilities (TWU) Consent Decree Brick Removal project, for $1,473,686.00, Bid. No. 25-074. C-A-1 Request that the City Council consider cancelling the regularly scheduled City Council meetings of November 26, 2025, and December 24, 2025. C-A-2 Request that the City Council consider authorizing the Cit

Presented in: City of Tyler City Council - October 22, 2025 on 2025-10-22
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Request that the City Council consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a Capital Improvement Project (CIP) construction contract with Crown Civil Construction Corporation for the Tyler Water Utilities (TWU) Consent Decree Brick Removal project, for $1,473,686.00, Bid. No. 25-074. C-A-1 Request that the City Council consider cancelling the regularly scheduled City Council meetings of November 26, 2025, and December 24, 2025. C-A-2 Request that the City Council consider authorizing the Cit”
SH
Stuart Hene
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
PH
Petra Hawkins
Councilmember (District 2)
YES
SM
Shonda Marsh
Councilmember (District 3)
YES
CC
Clint Childs
Councilmember (District 4)
YES
LN
Lloyd Nichols
Councilmember (District 5)
YES
CD
Carleen Dark-Bays
Councilmember (District 6)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Action item regarding Request that the City Council consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a Capital Improvement Project (CIP) construction contract with Crown Civil Construction Corporation for the Tyler Water U

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.