YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
7.B • ROAD AND BRIDGEPotter County (Potter County)

ROAD AND BRIDGE: To consider reimbursing Moore County for resurfacing improvements on an approximately 2,700-foot segment of Plum Creek Road in Potter County, which occurred during maintenance work on that road that also is located in Moore County, in the amount of approximately $13,000, with funds to come from the Road and Bridge road materials budget, and to take any action appropriate. [Coffee

Presented in: Potter County Commissioners Court - October 13, 2026 on 2026-10-13
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.5/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (5 - 0)
“ROAD AND BRIDGE: To consider reimbursing Moore County for resurfacing improvements on an approximately 2,700-foot segment of Plum Creek Road in Potter County, which occurred during maintenance work on that road that also is located in Moore County, in the amount of approximately $13,000, with funds to come from the Road and Bridge road materials budget, and to take any action appropriate. [Coffee”
NT
Nancy Tanner
County Judge
YES
BS
Blair Schaffer
Commissioner (Precinct 2)
YES
WC
Warren Coble, Sr.
Commissioner (Precinct 4)
YES
HK
H.R. Kelly
Commissioner (Precinct 1)
YES
JC
John Coffee
Commissioner (Precinct 3)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

ROAD AND BRIDGE: To consider reimbursing Moore County for resurfacing improvements on an approximately 2,700-foot segment of Plum Creek Road in Potter County, which occurred during maintenance work on that road that also is located in Moore County, in the amount of approximately $13,000, with funds to come from the Road and Bridge road materials budget, and to take any action appropriate. [Coffee, Brumley] Moore County Agreement.pdf

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.5/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).